Webflow vs Next.js for marketing sites
Webflow or Next.js for your website? What each is built for, who edits it, what it costs, and when a marketing site needs a React framework at all.
- Written by
Matthew Bishop- Published
- Reading time
- 5 minutes
Choose Webflow for a marketing site your team will edit and grow itself, with hosting and upkeep handled for you. Choose Next.js when the site is really a web application: logged-in areas, dashboards, pages built from live data, or deep links into your product. For a content-first marketing site built as code, Astro is usually the simpler fit.
We build marketing sites in Webflow and, when a site should be built as code, in Astro. Here’s how Next.js fits alongside them, and how we help teams choose.
What each one is
- Webflow is a website platform: a visual editor, a CMS and hosting in one plan. Pages are built from the site’s own components, and your team edits them in the browser.
- Next.js is “a React framework for building full-stack web applications” (Next.js). It’s built on React, and suits sites that behave like apps.
Next.js is a framework, not a platform. You get code, which you host somewhere such as Vercel, and content comes from wherever you connect it: files, a headless CMS or a database.
How they compare
Prices are in US dollars before tax, from the official pricing pages on 11 October 2026.
| Webflow | Next.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Marketing sites a team runs itself | Web applications built with React |
| Who edits pages | Your team, in a visual editor, from the site’s components | Developers, or your team through a connected CMS |
| How changes go live | Edit, check on staging, publish | Change the code, review it on a preview link, deploy |
| Content | Webflow’s CMS: 20,000 items and 40 collections on Premium | Whatever you connect: files, a headless CMS or a database |
| Logged-in and app features | Usually a separate app alongside the site | What it’s designed for |
| Hosting and upkeep | Included and managed by Webflow | A host such as Vercel; React and the framework need keeping up to date |
| Platform cost | From US$15 a month billed yearly, or US$25 with the CMS | Hosting, such as Vercel Pro at US$20 a month; every feature is build work |
| Best fit | Marketing teams who want to publish without a developer | Product teams with React developers building app-like sites |
Prices from webflow.com/pricing and vercel.com/pricing. Vercel’s free Hobby plan is for personal, non-commercial use.
When Webflow is the better choice
- It’s a marketing site. Home, product, pricing, landing pages, a blog and case studies are what Webflow is built for.
- Your marketing team wants to build pages itself. Marketers assemble new pages from approved components and edit the CMS without a developer (how that works).
- You don’t want developers on the critical path. A launch page or a pricing change shouldn’t wait for an engineering sprint. On Webflow, Endeavour Lotteries’ team builds every campaign page from about 20 components.
- You don’t want to own the upkeep. Hosting, security, SSL and backups come with the plan (what Webflow maintenance involves).
When Next.js is the better choice
- The site is part of the product. Logged-in areas, account pages, dashboards and pages built from live data are what Next.js is designed for.
- You already have React developers. The marketing site can share components, design and code with your app.
- Pages depend on data that changes constantly, such as listings, inventory or personalised content.
The trade-off is that the marketing team depends on developers for most changes unless a CMS is connected and set up well, and React, the framework and their dependencies all need keeping up to date.
Next.js or Astro?
If you’ve decided the site should be built as code, check whether it needs a React application at all.
| Next.js | Astro | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Web applications built with React | Content-driven sites: marketing, blogs, documentation |
| JavaScript in the browser | React runs in the browser, alongside server rendering | None by default; added only where a page needs it |
| Content | Whatever you connect | Content collections: Markdown with checked fields |
| Use it for | Logged-in areas, dashboards, live data | A marketing site that should be fast and simple to run |
Most marketing sites are content first, so we build ours in Astro: our own site and Generate’s both are. Astro can still use React for the parts of a page that need it (Astro). We’d point a team to Next.js when the marketing site and the product really are one application. The full comparison is in Webflow vs Astro.
How to decide
- Is it a marketing site or an application? A marketing site suits Webflow, or Astro if it should be built as code. An application suits Next.js.
- Who will make most of the changes? If it’s your marketing team, building pages themselves, choose Webflow.
- Do you have React developers? Next.js makes most sense when the people maintaining it already work in React.
- Who looks after it? Webflow handles hosting and upkeep. A Next.js site needs developers to keep it updated.
For the costs on each side, see how to scope and budget a website.
Questions we get asked
Is Next.js better than Webflow for SEO?
Both can do everything search engines need: fast pages, clean HTML, titles, sitemaps, redirects and structured data. On Webflow your team sets these in the editor; on Next.js developers build them into the site. For a content-first site, Astro makes very light pages the default.
Do we need Next.js for our marketing site?
Usually not. Next.js earns its place when the site is part of your product, with logged-in areas or live data. A marketing site is better served by Webflow, if your team wants to edit it, or Astro, if it should be built as code.
Can a marketing team edit a Next.js site?
Through a headless CMS set up by developers, or by asking an AI assistant for changes and checking them on a preview. Without either, every change goes through a developer. That’s the main reason we steer marketing sites towards Webflow, or Astro with a clear editing workflow.
Is Next.js cheaper than Webflow?
The platform can be: hosting on Vercel Pro is US$20 a month, against US$25 a month billed yearly for Webflow with the CMS. But on Next.js nearly every change is developer time, so it usually costs more to run a marketing site that changes often.
If you’d like help choosing, see our Webflow and custom development service, or tell us about your site.



